1. Upload & Map
2. Conversational Action
3. Results & Chat
I need to check the quality of my latest survey data. Can you help?
I've opened Survey Guard for you. Upload your survey questionnaire and response data to get started. I'll help you through the analysis.
Survey Guard
MCP App
1
Upload2
Map Fields3
Processing4
Results
luxury-brand-tracker-2026.docx
245 KB
✓
responses-wave3-n1204.csv
8.2 MB
✓
Panel Type
Consumer
B2B
Paid Panel
Quick Poll
I've opened Survey Guard for you. Upload your survey questionnaire and response data to get started.
Survey Guard
MCP App
✓
Upload2
Map Fields3
Processing4
Results| Survey Question | CSV Column | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| What is your opinion on luxury brands? | Q1_LUXURY_OPINION | 98% |
| How often do you purchase luxury items? | Q2_PURCHASE_FREQ | 95% |
| Which luxury brands do you prefer? | Q3_BRAND_PREF | 92% |
| Is sustainability important in luxury? | Q4_SUSTAINABILITY | 78% |
| + 12 more mapped fields | ||
Looks good, let's start the analysis
Starting the analysis now.
Survey Guard
MCP App
✓
Upload✓
Map Fields3
Processing4
Results67%
Analyzing response quality with AI...
Batch 8 of 12 · 804 of 1,204 participants evaluated
Survey Guard
MCP App
✓
Upload✓
Map Fields✓
Processing4
ResultsTotal Participants
1,204
Critical Review
47
3.9%
Quality Concern
89
7.4%
Passed
1,068
88.7%
critical-review-required.csv
47 rows
↓ Download
quality-concern.csv
89 rows
↓ Download
all-participants-consolidated.xlsx
1,204 rows
↓ Download
What are the main reasons people got flagged as critical?
Based on the analysis, the 47 critical participants were flagged primarily for:
1. Straightlining (23 participants) - Gave identical responses across multiple matrix questions, particularly in the brand perception and sustainability sections.
2. Speed completion (14 participants) - Finished the survey in under 4 minutes (median was 14 minutes). Their open-ended responses were minimal or copy-pasted.
3. Gibberish/incoherent responses (10 participants) - Open-text answers contained random characters, repeated phrases, or content completely unrelated to the questions.
Would you like me to download the critical review file so you can examine the specific flagged responses?
1. Straightlining (23 participants) - Gave identical responses across multiple matrix questions, particularly in the brand perception and sustainability sections.
2. Speed completion (14 participants) - Finished the survey in under 4 minutes (median was 14 minutes). Their open-ended responses were minimal or copy-pasted.
3. Gibberish/incoherent responses (10 participants) - Open-text answers contained random characters, repeated phrases, or content completely unrelated to the questions.
Would you like me to download the critical review file so you can examine the specific flagged responses?
Can you re-run with B2B panel criteria instead? The thresholds should be stricter.
Switching to B2B panel configuration and restarting the analysis. B2B criteria use higher thresholds for thoughtfulness and relevance, which should catch more borderline cases.